Imagem da capa

Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production En...

ver descrição completa

Principais autores: Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano, Pedroso, Bruno, Moraes, Jessyca, Picinin, Claudia Tania
Formato: Artigo
Idioma: Inglês
Publicado em: Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) 2021
Acesso em linha: http://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
id peri-article-13689
recordtype ojs
spelling peri-article-136892024-05-01T10:37:42Z Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil Qualidade de vida de professores do ensino superior: avaliação de professores da área de Engenharia de Produção no Brasil Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano Pedroso, Bruno Moraes, Jessyca Picinin, Claudia Tania Saúde; Educação Física Engenharia de produção; Ensino superior; Avaliação da qualidade de vida. Higher education; Evaluation of quality of life; Production engineering. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study. OBJETIVO: Analisar a produção científica dos docentes que atuam em programas de pós-graduação na área de Engenharia de Produção no Brasil de 2013 a 2015. MÉTODOS: Para tal, o instrumento WHOQOL-bref foi aplicado através da plataforma Google Drive em 130 professores que atuam in programas de pós-graduação de Engenharia de Produção.RESULTADOS: Os resultados mostraram maior deficiência de Qualidade de Vida nas facetas Recreação e Lazer (53,08), Sentimentos Positivos (57,88) e Sono e Repouso (29,42). Os pontos de maior satisfação foram quanto a Mobilidade (83,85), Autoestima (81,73) e Ambiente do lar (80,58). Além disso, os domínios Psicológico (70,48) e Físico (70,27) foram os melhores escores. Por outro lado, Ambiente (66,18) e Relações Sociais (66,28) apresentaram as piores pontuações. Conclui-se que a carreira docente justifica alguns aspectos positivos e negativos da Qualidade de Vida da população pesquisada.CONCLUSÕES: Verificou-se que os homens pontuaram mais alto que as mulheres, enquanto os professores com bolsa de pesquisa tiveram pontuações mais altas de qualidade de vida em comparação com os que não tinham bolsa de pesquisa. Além disso, foi possível identificar que indivíduos com 16 anos ou mais de tempo de serviço apresentaram os menores escores em quatro dos sete itens e que indivíduos com tempo de serviço entre oito a 15 anos apresentaram os maiores escores em seis dos sete itens avaliados neste estudo. Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR) 2021-12-31 info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion application/pdf http://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689 10.3895/rbqv.v13n0.13689 Revista Brasileira de Qualidade de Vida; v. 13 (2021) 2175-0858 10.3895/rbqv.v1n0 eng http://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689/pdf Direitos autorais 2022 CC-BY http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
institution Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
collection PERI
language Inglês
format Artigo
author Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
Pedroso, Bruno
Moraes, Jessyca
Picinin, Claudia Tania
spellingShingle Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
Pedroso, Bruno
Moraes, Jessyca
Picinin, Claudia Tania
Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
author_sort Pinto, Guilherme Moreira Caetano
title Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_short Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_full Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_fullStr Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the Production Engineering field in Brazil
title_sort quality of life in teaching at the higher level: evaluation of professors in the production engineering field in brazil
description OBJECTIVE: To analyze the quality of life (QOL) of all Brazilian professors who works in graduate course in Production Engineering field of 2013 to 2015.METHODS: For that, WHOQOL-bref instrument was applied in the Google Drive platform with 130 teachers enrolled in graduate programs of Production Engineering.RESULTS: The results showed higher QOL deficiency in the Recreation and Leisure (53.08), Positive feelings (57.88) and Sleep and Rest (59.42) facets. The points of greatest satisfaction were about Mobility (83.85), Self-esteem (81.73) and Home Environment (80.58). Nonetheless, the Psychological (70.48) and Physical (70.27) domains were the best scores. On the other hand, the Environment (66.18) and Social Relationship (66.28) had the worst scores. It is concluded that the teaching career justifies some positive and negative aspects of the researched population QOL.CONCLUSIONS: It was found that males scored higher than females, while professors with researcher grants had higher QOL scores compared with who did not hold researcher grant. Furthermore, it was possible to identify that individuals with 16 years or more of service time presented the lowest scores in four of seven items and that individuals with service time between eight to 15 years presented the highest scores in six of seven items evaluated in this study.
publisher Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná (UTFPR)
publishDate 2021
url http://periodicos.utfpr.edu.br/rbqv/article/view/13689
_version_ 1805535400064712704
score 10,814766

Registros relacionados