Pastagens de Tifton 85 e Coastcross consorciadas ou não com amendoim forrageiro
The use of pasture has been the basis for food production animals in all regions of Brazil, there by knowledge of production and quality of existing pastures is required. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the botanical and structural components of Tifton 85 pastures and Coastcross in consortiu...
| Autor principal: | Oliveira, Lidiane Fonseca de |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação) |
| Idioma: | Português |
| Publicado em: |
Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná
2020
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: |
http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/11151 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| Resumo: |
The use of pasture has been the basis for food production animals in all regions of Brazil, there by knowledge of production and quality of existing pastures is required. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the botanical and structural components of Tifton 85 pastures and Coastcross in consortium with forage peanut. The experiment was conducted at the Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná, in the Campus Dois Vizinhos, and has area consists of 12 paddocks of 225m² (15x15) totaling 2700 m². The experiment had four treatments, Tifton 85 and Coastcross in culture, Tifton 85+ forage peanut and Coastcross + forage Peanut, the consortium was established interleaved and successively that featured a grass line and three legume lines thus providing 75 % of the area for developing the legume. The seedlings were planted in spacings of 0.6 m between rows and 0.5 m between plants and peanut implemented by means of seeds and grasses through seedlings. The samples were weighed and was subsequently performed to determine the botanical composition. For grasses, it was made the separation of structural components (leaf blade, stem and dead material). For legumes and weeds were their heavy proportions. The experimental design was a randomized block design, using four treatments and three repetitions. The results showed that there was similarity between the pastures studied for forage mass, indicating that the grass even when subjected to the consortium, has good development and aggressiveness, settling quickly in the area, not affecting the total production. For invasive and dead material, they did not achieve significant results over the cuts, not affecting the establishment and production of grasses. However, natural pastures showed higher percentage of leaves and stem + sheath, showing that peanut presence interfered with the production of these, when submitted to the consortium. The mass of peanut showed good contribution to the total mass forage |
|---|