Licenciamento ambiental para atividade de postos revendedores de combustíveis: estudo de caso em Londrina/PR

Fuel dealer stations (PRCs) are undertakings that ensure that the product reaches the final consumer. The activities of this undertaking are considered potentially polluting by CONAMA Resolution No. 273/00, as the substances sold are considered toxic and capable of causing damage to the environment...

ver descrição completa

Autor principal: Lima, Ellen Caroline
Formato: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação)
Idioma: Português
Publicado em: Universidade Tecnológica Federal do Paraná 2021
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha: http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/handle/1/25744
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
Resumo: Fuel dealer stations (PRCs) are undertakings that ensure that the product reaches the final consumer. The activities of this undertaking are considered potentially polluting by CONAMA Resolution No. 273/00, as the substances sold are considered toxic and capable of causing damage to the environment and human health. For this reason, it is an activity subject to environmental licensing, administered by the competent body. The person in charge of the undertaking must follow up with obligations with the competent bodies in order to keep the establishment in operation, such as, for example, the application for renewal of the operating license. Licensing can be considered a lengthy administrative act due to the high demand for projects that need to be inspected, in addition to documentary analysis. It is worth remembering that in Londrina there are 289 PRCs; in addition, the environmental agency serves other municipalities in the region and licenses projects in related areas. Considering this problem, this case study aimed to diagnose the non-conformities in the physical structure with the onsite surveys and documentary analysis in ten PRCs in the Londrina / PR region. Analyzing these factors, some irregularities were identified that can cause the delay in issuing the license, such as: inadequacy of the physical environment of the establishment such as excess liquid in the mouths, sump’s of pumps and tanks, spill’s; broken crosspieces; lack of cleaning of the channels and separating boxes; solid waste stored incorrectly; absence of dumps in the supply lane and; cracks and cracks in the floor of the supply lane. It was also noted the lack of knowledge of at least one employee for the operation of the monitoring panel; the incomplete elaboration of environmental studies or the non-delivery of documentation, such as the declaration of polluting cargo; municipal consent to discharge effluents; monitoring report; photographic material showing the cleaning of the discharge nozzles, sump’s and spill; and environmental control plan. The non-conforming items found were also identified in other case studies, and may cause environmental impacts, which will lead to the request for an environmental liability report. The analyzed parameters do not follow a continuous line, although items in common were computed, which shows the particularity of each project. For this reason, each process is processed in a unique way. In view of the above, some improvements were suggested, such as: periodic maintenance of equipment and physical structure; weekly rotation of employees to check the condition of the facilities through the inspection check-list; environmental awareness; early review of the necessary documentation to be delivered in the process; courses offered by the competent environmental agency, aimed at those interested.